Tadeas Paroulek vs Yannik Kelm Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Jul at 09:28 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Paroulek vs Y. Kelm

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Paroulek 1 - 0 Kelm
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tadeas Paroulek winning 2 and Yannik Kelm winning 1. The last match between Tadeas Paroulek and Yannik Kelm was at the M15 Uslar, 17-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tadeas Paroulek getting the victory 5-7 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paroulek | 1 |
| Kelm | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Uslar(07-17-25)
T. Paroulek vs Y. Kelm H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.10% (224-131) | Career Total W/L | 49.09% (54-56) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Paroulek vs Y. Kelm Match Preview:
- Recent form indicates Kelm is stronger on second serve, winning 48.14% compared to Paroulek's 42.29%.
- Return stats favor Kelm, achieving 54.26% on opponents' second serves, compared to Paroulek's 43.19%.
- Kelm also edges out on first serve returns at 31.96% versus Paroulek's 29.8%. Could this serve as an advantage?
- Under pressure, Paroulek displays slightly better breakpoint-saving ability at 52.27% compared to Kelm's 48.91%.
- Paroulek boasts a superior match win percentage over the last year at 73.61%, while Kelm stands at 60%.
- Surface prowess shows Paroulek excels on Hard courts with a 66% win rate, whereas Kelm prefers Indoor Hard courts, winning 63% of matches.
- Both players predominantly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, yet Paroulek has a better win percentage in this category at 73.91%.
- Kelm has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 201.44 compared to Paroulek's 333.38. Does higher competition level give Kelm an edge?
- Both players have evenly split their deciding set performances, each winning 56% of them over the last year.
- Kelm is slightly more efficient in breakpoint conversion at 36% while Paroulek converts 33.18% of opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):
The comprehensive analysis of recent performance stats reveals distinct trends that favor Kelm in their upcoming match against Paroulek.
The stronger second serve and return game statistics are key indicators that might give Kelm an edge, particularly in pressuring Paroulek's serves.
However, Paroulek's overall match performance over the last year and slightly superior breakpoint-saving ability showcase their resilience under pressure.
Nevertheless, the level of competition Kelm has faced and their marginally better conversion of breakpoints position them as the favored player.
In light of these factors, Kelm is the likely winner of this match, based on the statistical evidence and comparative advantage in critical areas.
Tadeas Paroulek vs Yannik Kelm Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Paroulek vs Y. Kelm H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 3:0:26 | Average Match Time | 3:0:26 |
| 72% (64/89) | 1st Serve % | 65% (64/99) |
| 52% (33/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (34/64) |
| 36% (9/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (10/35) |
| 79% (11/14) | Break Pts Won % | 69% (9/13) |
| 56% (55/99) | Return Points Win % | 53% (47/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Paroulek Recent Matches Played
Y. Kelm Recent Matches Played

T. Paroulek vs Y. Kelm Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.10% (224/131) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.09% (54/56) |
| 60.88% (487/313) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.99% (121/126) |
| 54.26% (4010/3380) | Games Win/Loss | 49.53% (1156/1178) |
| 64.49% (69/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 64.52% (140/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.15% (39/42) |
| 48.39% (15/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 366 | Aces Total | 72 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 729 | Total Double Faults | 273 |
| 1:15:32 | Average Match Time | 1:3:42 |
| 449.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 283.5 |
| 62% (10160/16306) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2605/4512) |
| 65% (6576/10160) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1602/2605) |
| 50% (3096/6146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (840/1907) |
| 44% (876/1981) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (203/486) |
| 43% (7371/17027) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1873/4487) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.38% (11/10) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 63.77% (213/121) | Futures W/L | 51.43% (54/51) |
| 63% (219/347) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (54/110) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (41/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (11/20) |
| 56% (53/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 90% (213/191) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (56/48) |
| 10% (213/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (56/8) |
| 23% (141/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (54/6) |